Re: JSONPATH documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: JSONPATH documentation
Date
Msg-id 83d5bb74-9c47-76a5-0c81-6b1c19421288@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSONPATH documentation  (Liudmila Mantrova <l.mantrova@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-09-25 16:46, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
> On 9/25/19 12:08 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2019-09-23 00:03, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> While we're whining about this, I find it very off-putting that
>>> the jsonpath stuff was inserted in the JSON functions section
>>> ahead of the actual JSON functions.  I think it should have
>>> gone after them, because it feels like a barely-related interjection
>>> as it stands.  Maybe there's even a case that it should be
>>> its own <sect1>, after the "functions-json" section.
>> I'd just switch the sect2's around.
> 
> As more SQL/JSON functionality gets added, I believe a separate sect1 is 
> likely to be more justified. However, for v12 I'd vote for moving sect2 
> down. The patch is attached, it also fixes the ambiguous sentence that 
> has raised questions in this thread.

committed, thanks

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: dropdb --force
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL12 and older versions of OpenSSL