Re: Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query
Date
Msg-id 8396.1222867812@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query  ("David logan" <djlogan2@comcast.net>)
Responses Re: Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query  ("David logan" <djlogan2@comcast.net>)
List pgsql-performance
"David logan" <djlogan2@comcast.net> writes:
> (The question is why this simple select takes me 20 minutes to run...)

What have you got work_mem set to?  The hash join is not going to be
real fast if it has to split the join into multiple batches, so you
want work_mem large enough to hold the whole inner relation.  That would
be at least 20MB in this example, probably quite a bit more after
allowing for per-row overhead in the table.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "David logan"
Date:
Subject: Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query
Next
From: "David logan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Mystefied at poor performance of a standard query