Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs
Date
Msg-id 839181ab-5edb-d696-f888-458099f2d09d@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/16/22 16:53, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Personally I don't have problem with the use of SETTING. I think the
>> meaning is pretty plain in context and unlikely to produce any confusion.
> I'm just unhappy about the disconnect with the documentation.  I wonder
> if we could get away with s/configuration parameter/setting/g in the docs.
>
>             


I don't think we need to fix that here though. If you can live with
SETTING for now I will undertake to fix the docs post-feature-freeze if
necessary.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs
Next
From: Zheng Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs