On 3/16/22 16:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I don't have problem with the use of SETTING. I think the
>> meaning is pretty plain in context and unlikely to produce any confusion.
> I'm just unhappy about the disconnect with the documentation. I wonder
> if we could get away with s/configuration parameter/setting/g in the docs.
>
>
I don't think we need to fix that here though. If you can live with
SETTING for now I will undertake to fix the docs post-feature-freeze if
necessary.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com