On Aug 14 2025, at 11:49 am, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 03:43, Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> wrote:
>> Well, that was rushed. Apologies.
>
> Would you be ok with adding the Assert after the "a == NULL" check?, i.e:
>
> if (a == NULL || prevbit == 0)
> return -2;
>
> /* Validate callers didn't give us something out of range */
> Assert(prevbit <= a->nwords * BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD);
>
> David
Good thinking, less contorted logic and a more obvious check for NULL
and the result to expect in that case.
-greg
