Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types
Date
Msg-id 833.1516834367@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Here's a version of this rebased up to HEAD, fixing a couple of trivial
merge conflicts and incorporating the docs delta I posted separately.

(I'd supposed this patch was still OK because the patch tester said so,
but I now see that the tester was only testing the docs delta :-(.)

            regards, tom lane


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large numberof relations