On Fri, 09 Jun 2000 11:26:40 -0400 Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure if HAVE_SYS_UN_H is an appropriate way of testing
> for it or not (I see you did it that way in a couple of places).
> I'd rather make a new symbol HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS, I think, and
HAVE_AF_UNIX or HAVE_AF_UNIX_SOCKETS might be clearer about what the
feature includes/excludes.
Regards,
Giles
