Re: configurability of OOM killer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florian Weimer
Subject Re: configurability of OOM killer
Date
Msg-id 82k5lngwgx.fsf@mid.bfk.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to configurability of OOM killer  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: configurability of OOM killer  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Alvaro Herrera:

> I am wondering if we can set the system up so that it skips postmaster,
> bgwriter etc, and feels more preference towards normal backends (but
> then, we would try to give them less points than other regular
> processes).  That could make the system more robust overall, even if the
> sysadmin hasn't configured it.

How much does that help?  Postmaster &c still need to be shut down
when a regular backend dies due to SIGKILL.

--
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange behavior on plpgsql trigger function in if comparison
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: Run positions on Tape