Re: STDERR vs. SYSLOG logging - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Spiegelberg, Greg
Subject Re: STDERR vs. SYSLOG logging
Date
Msg-id 82E74D266CB9B44390D3CCE44A781ED90B6B07@POSTOFFICE.cranel.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to STDERR vs. SYSLOG logging  (Kevin Kempter <kevin@kevinkempterllc.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Kevin Kempter sayeth...
>
> Hi List;
>
> Anyone have any thoughts per which logging method (SYSLOG vs
> STDERR) is the
> better approach ?
>

From looking at 8.2.1 source the internal postgres stderr redirect
method only does line buffering which explains why we see a performance
gain when we turn logging off or have it use syslog instead.

Syslog with the '-' option in front of the log file in syslog.conf is a
good option.  As I understand it, ulog is also a good option but I
haven't any experience with it.

Logging when the individual log entry is buffered does present a risk of
losing a log entry on a system crash but for the purposes of Postgres I
would think that such a system crash would have been caused by something
external to Postgres and the loss of any logs in this case is okay.

Greg

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: reindexdb hangs
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: infinite blocking statements in 8.2.3