Re: Ordered Append Node - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florian Weimer
Subject Re: Ordered Append Node
Date
Msg-id 828x4ppc0i.fsf@mid.bfk.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ordered Append Node  (Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Responses Re: Ordered Append Node  (Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Markus Schiltknecht:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I think you need it because there are potentially many input types.

Eh, "tapes".

> Given the partitioning case, I'd expect all rows to have an equal
> tuple descriptor. Maybe this is a matter of what to optimize, then?
>
> Could you elaborate on what use case you have in mind?

You need a priority queue to figure out from which tape (partition)
you need to remove the next tuple.

--
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Markus Schiltknecht
Date:
Subject: Re: Ordered Append Node
Next
From: Markus Schiltknecht
Date:
Subject: Re: Ordered Append Node