Re: "stored procedures" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Berkus
Subject Re: "stored procedures"
Date
Msg-id 828069661.182512.1303490707699.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "stored procedures"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> >> I'd like a pony, too. Let's be perfectly clear about this: there is
> >> no
> >> part of plpgsql that can run outside a transaction today, and
> >> probably
> >> no part of the other PLs either, and changing that "without major
> >> changes" is wishful thinking of the first order.

I always thought that it was pretty clear that autonomous transactions were a major feature, and very difficult to
implement. Otherwise we'd have done SPs back in 7.4 when we first had this discussion.
 

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: best way to test new index?
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: "stored procedures"