On May 7, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>> Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
>>>> functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
>>>> section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest
>>>> of the functions?
>>>
>>> No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
>>
>> Yea, I was wondering about that. I think the best idea would be to
>> reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather
>> than move them.
>
> Well, pg_backend_pid makes no sense being in with the stats
> functions, so I'll move it. I'll just include references to the
> other stuff.
Turns out it didn't really make much more sense to move
pg_backend_pid either, so I went with Bruce's original idea.
--
Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
