Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date
Msg-id 8275.1371216112@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
> On 14.06.2013 16:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Refresh my memory as to why we need to WAL-log hints for checksumming?

> Torn pages:

So it's not that we actually need to log the individual hint bit
changes, it's that we need to WAL-log a full page image on the first
update after a checkpoint, so as to recover from torn-page cases.
Which one are we doing?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Next
From: Benedikt Grundmann
Date:
Subject: Re: MD5 aggregate