On 03/03/2026 17:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> Ok, here's another version of Sami's repro. I realized that it doesn't
>> even need concurrent sessions, so I moved it to the main regression test
>> suite, into the 'prepared_xacts' test. Looks good?
>
> Not directly relevant to the thing being tested here, but ...
> I wonder if we couldn't reduce future maintenance effort for
> prepared_xacts_1.out by modifying that test script to make an
> early exit if prepared transactions are disabled.
+1, I was just thinking the same.
Here's a patch to do that. I'll backpatch this to all supported
versions, to make backpatching test changes less painful in the future.
- Heikki
