Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
Date
Msg-id 8206.1315437372@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held  (daveg <daveg@sonic.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
daveg <daveg@sonic.net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 06:25:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ...  But maybe it'd be interesting for Dave to stick a
>> LockReleaseAll call into ProcKill() and see if that makes things better.
>> (Dave: test that before you put it in production, I'm not totally sure
>> it's safe.)

> Re safety, what is the worst case here? 

I think a failure would be pretty obvious --- if it gets through
regression tests it's probably fine.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: daveg
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held