ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think the only serious objection to this would be that it'd mean that
>> tuples that should have an index entry might not have one.
> This can occurs when we do REINDEX after DELETE, because dead tuples are
> excluded on REINDEX.
Good point. So we already have that problem anyway ...
regards, tom lane
