Hi,
On 29.01.2026 15:19, VASUKI M wrote:
> I am back with a new patch.
1. It would be good to test this with assertions enabled. it would be
good to test this with assertions enabled. I noticed: MISSING_STATS is
currently defined withthe same bit value as FREEZE (0x08).
2. The current placement of the MISSING_STATS check insideanalyze_rel()
looks problematic. Right now it is executed immediately after
vacuum_open_relation(), beforewe verify that the relation was
successfully opened and is not pg_statistic, the user has privileges. It
seems more appropriate to move the MISSING_STATS check further
down,after the standard skip conditions.
--
Best regards,
Ilia Evdokimov,
Tantor Labs LLC,
https://tantorlabs.com/
