Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication
Date
Msg-id 81f0018e736f0d792604b8183f7bd3cb4674e77e.camel@oopsware.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Optimization of vacuum for logical replication  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Mittwoch, den 21.08.2019, 12:20 +0300 schrieb Konstantin Knizhnik:
> I wonder if we can check that
> 
> 1. wal_revel is "logical"
> 2. There are no physical replication slots
> 3. WAL archiving is disables

Not sure i get that correctly, i can still have a physical standby
without replication slots connected to such an instance. How would your
idea handle this situation?

    Bernd





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments