Re: WAL files backup - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Chad Wagner
Subject Re: WAL files backup
Date
Msg-id 81961ff50702160334x411e3aeau76ca57c628e0f45e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL files backup  ("Eduardo J. Ortega" <ejortegau@cable.net.co>)
Responses Re: WAL files backup  ("Andy Shellam (Mailing Lists)" <andy.shellam-lists@mailnetwork.co.uk>)
List pgsql-admin
On 2/15/07, Eduardo J. Ortega <ejortegau@cable.net.co> wrote:
After erasing the "less than  names" WAL files, we add to tar the remaining
WAL records (0003B, 0003C  and so on on the example). The more WAL files you
have after 0003B, the more up to date DB you get after restore (since it has
more WAL files indicating more transactions that took place after the backup.

Why bother trying to delete WAL files older than the .backup file?  When PostgreSQL is in recovery mode it knows which WAL files are necessary to perform the recovery.

Also, the documentation recommends excluding the pg_xlog directory when performing the base backup.  Likely when it comes time to recovery the online WAL files have been archived already, so it is a risk of confusion I am sure.



--
Chad
http://www.postgresqlforums.com/

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Eduardo J. Ortega"
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL files backup
Next
From: "Andy Shellam (Mailing Lists)"
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL files backup