Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id 815268.1593647651@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-standard function body  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:58 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> With what other implementations is it compatible?

> Judging by the Wikipedia article[1], it sounds like at least DB2 and
> MySQL/MariaDB are purposely striving for conformance.
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL/PSM

but ... but ... but ... that's about SQL/PSM, which is not this.

Having said that, I wonder whether this work could be repurposed
to be the start of a real SQL/PSM implementation.  There's other
stuff in SQL/PSM, but a big part of it is routines that are written
with syntax like this.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"