Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached
Date
Msg-id 81460.1637720668@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached  (James Sewell <james.sewell@jirotech.com>)
Responses Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached
List pgsql-general
James Sewell <james.sewell@jirotech.com> writes:
>> I'm also wondering a bit about whether they're being blocked on a lock,
>> eg. due to something taking an exclusive lock on pg_authid or pg_database.
>> pg_locks might be interesting to check.

> postgres=# select * from pg_locks where not granted;

The hypothesis I'm thinking of is that incoming sessions are being blocked
somewhere before they can acquire a ProcArray entry; if so, they'd not
show up in either pg_stat_activity or pg_locks.  What we have to look for
then is evidence of somebody holding a strong lock on a shared relation.
Try "select * from pg_locks where locktype = 'relation' and database = 0".

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: James Sewell
Date:
Subject: Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached
Next
From: Luca Ferrari
Date:
Subject: get last timestamp of table ddl