Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment
Date
Msg-id 8134.1538444333@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> I think if we do Analyze on the table after populating rows, it should
> use just one worker and that should be sufficient to hit the case
> being discussed.  I would like to change the test so that it uses just
> one worker.

I thought that adding an ANALYZE would make the test be net slower, not
faster; ANALYZE isn't free, even on just a row or so.  Also, I believe
that coding the test this way makes the leader send the param values to
multiple workers, which would flush out any problems with serializing a
value multiple times.  As against that, there's a hazard that the number
of workers might not be stable ... but it seems like we have lots of
other occurrences of that same hazard elsewhere in this test script.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18] GSSAPI encryption support
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction