Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: NOT IN subquery optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Li, Zheng
Subject Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Date
Msg-id 812F84BC-702F-4063-95CC-A7DBD7C9D66B@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOT IN subquery optimization  (zhengli <zhelli@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Rebased patch is attached.

Comments are welcome.

-----------
Zheng Li
AWS, Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL
 

On 6/14/19, 5:39 PM, "zhengli" <zhelli@amazon.com> wrote:

    In our patch, we only proceed with the ANTI JOIN transformation if
    subplan_is_hashable(subplan) is
    false, it requires the subquery to be planned at this point.
    
    To avoid planning the subquery again later on, I want to keep a pointer of
    the subplan in SubLink so that we can directly reuse the subplan when
    needed. However, this change breaks initdb for some reason and I'm trying to
    figure it out.
    
    I'll send the rebased patch in the following email since it's been a while.
    
    
    
    --
    Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
    
    
    


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: zhengli
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and KeyManagement Service (KMS)