On 1/7/19 4:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-01-07 16:01:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>> Stable expressions are quite ok for fast defaults. The expression is
>>> evaluated once when the ALTER TABLE is done and the result (not the
>>> expression) is stored in the catalog. The reason we check for volatile
>>> expressions is precisely because we don't want all the existing rows to
>>> get a single value in that case. This was discussed during the Postgres
>>> 11 development cycle.
>> Hmm.
>>
>> The issue here is that if the table is empty, the old behavior evaluated
>> the expression zero times during ALTER TABLE. Now we evaluate it once,
>> and if that throws an error, that's a user-visible behavior change.
>>
>> Perhaps it's okay to decide that that's an acceptable behavioral change,
>> but it makes this feature less transparent than it was supposed to be.
That's true. But only slightly less transparent, I'd suggest :-)
> It doesn't seem too hard to scan far enough to see whether there's a
> single non-dead row. So we could fix this, if we wanted.
>
> But I'm disinclined to think that it's worth doing so - and there could
> be drawbacks, e.gg tables that are all-dead. Given the IMO quite minor
> behaviour change, I'm thus disinclined to "fix" this..
>
agreed. It might be worth a doc note?
cheers
andrew
