Re: pgindent run? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgindent run?
Date
Msg-id 8041.985235707@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgindent run?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgindent run?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Hey, I am open to whatever people want to do.  Just remember that we
> accumulate lots of patches/development during the slow time before
> development, and those patches become harder to apply.  Peter E has some
> already.

Why not start a devel cycle by (a) branching the tree, (b) applying
all held-over patches, and then (c) running pgindent?

I'd probably wait a week or so between (a) and (c) to let people push
in whatever they have pending.  But in general it seems a lot safer
to pgindent at the front end of the cycle not the back end.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: More on elog and error codes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: RELEASE STOPPER? nonportable int64 constants in pg_crc.c