Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Date
Msg-id 801b970ec2b13e81fbd073dfc4252464.squirrel@sq.gransy.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2 Září 2011, 12:45, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:01, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> wrote:
>> What about logging it with a lower level, e.g. NOTICE instead of the
>> current LOG? If that's not a solution then a new GUC is needed I guess.
>
> I guess if it's at a DEBUG level it won't annoy anybody who doesn't
> need it. Not sure if NOTICE is low enough..

I've changed the level to NOTICE. I guess I could put that to info, but
the debug levels seem too low to me. Is there a rule of a thumb about
where to put messages?

Tomas
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Re: help with plug-in function for additional (partition/shard) visibility checks
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress