Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Erik Wienhold
Subject Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Date
Msg-id 7njdkzeco47heg6tglzsm5wmmbb56vd66f7pta6gazb2k52viu@av3wruqnylpp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Responses Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
List pgsql-docs
On 2023-11-13 15:24 +0100, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> I also noticed that when people say "ISO 8601" they usually mean RFC
> 3389 or some subset of ISO 8601.

Forgot this fine visualization of the differences:
https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/

-- 
Erik



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently