Re: [HACKERS] pg_catversion builtin function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 12/14/2016 08:52 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> But I understand your concern, so "Rejected" is ok under
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/12/906/
>
> I have a better reason for rejecting this patch: we already have this feature.
>
> rhaas=# select catalog_version_no from pg_control_system();
>  catalog_version_no
> --------------------
>           201612081
> (1 row)
>
>

Ah, perfect !

Thanks, Robert

Best regards, Jesper