Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations
Date
Msg-id 7f7f48c1-3ce7-ff3d-5d0a-bd965cb13095@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSLimplementations
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/22/18 02:29, Michael Paquier wrote:
> However there is as well the argument that this list's contents are not
> directly used now, and based on what I saw from the MacOS SSL and GnuTLS
> patches that would not be the case after either.

Right, there is no facility for negotiating the channel binding type, so
a boolean result should be enough.

In which case we wouldn't actually need this for GnuTLS yet.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Test-cases for exclusion constraints is missing inalter_table.sql file
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE