Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Drouvot, Bertrand
Subject Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date
Msg-id 7eef6187-e53d-2bd8-9f76-988f109a702c@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 4/4/23 8:13 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 11:42 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>> Done in V58 and now this is as simple as:
> 
> 
> Minor comments on 0004 (address if you agree):
> 

Thanks for the review!

> * Consider static inline for WalSndWakeupProcessRequests()?

Agree and done in V60 just shared up-thread.

> * Is the WalSndWakeup() in KeepFileRestoredFromArchive() more like the
> flush case? Why is the second argument unconditionally true? I don't
> think the cascading logical walsenders have anything to do until the
> WAL is actually applied.
> 

Agree and changed it to "(true, false)" in V60.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Next
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys