Re: Built-in CTYPE provider - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Date
Msg-id 7e90d0fb47bfffb92adda6445852b68fd6f8c20c.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Built-in CTYPE provider  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 07:00 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
>  What I am against is routinely updating the built-in provider to adopt any changes
> > that Unicode makes.
>
> Given all the messages on this thread, if the feature remains in PostgreSQL, I
> advise you to be ready to tolerate PostgreSQL "routinely updating the built-in
> provider to adopt any changes that Unicode makes".  Maybe someone will change
> something in v18 so it's not like that, but don't count on it.
>
> Would you like to change your vote to "okay", keep your vote at "not okay", or
> change it to an abstention?

In that case I am against it.  Against the "routinely" in particular.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: CI, macports, darwin version problems
Next
From: feichanghong
Date:
Subject: Re: temp table on commit delete rows performance issue