Re: initdb when data/ folder has mount points - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: initdb when data/ folder has mount points
Date
Msg-id 7e242a07-5d25-b669-f69e-349dd8ce50b2@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to initdb when data/ folder has mount points  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Responses Re: initdb when data/ folder has mount points
List pgsql-general
On 02/21/2018 06:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
Apparently, initdb assumes that data/ is one big mount point. However, we 
have four mount points:
/var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/backup
/var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/base
/var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/pg_log
/var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/pg_xlog
Don't do that.

There's no reason for backup storage to be under the data directory (and
lots of good reasons for it not to be).  Just put it somewhere else.

The supported way to put pg_xlog on a separate volume is to put that
mount point somewhere else, and make $PGDATA/pg_xlog be a symlink to
it.  IIRC, there's an initdb option to help with that, though you can
also make it so manually after initdb.

For pg_log, just put it somewhere else and set the appropriate
configuration option to say where to write the postmaster log files.
Or you could use a symlink, like the solution for pg_xlog, but
I don't see any advantage there.

I don't see any point in making base/ be its own mount point.  Once
you get rid of those other subdirectories there's not going to be
enough "global" storage left to justify its own volume.

I'm replicating the structure in our existing systems.  Is there an (up to date) Best Practices document for these kinds of issues?


--
Money Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Understanding query planner cpu usage
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb when data/ folder has mount points