Hi,
On 2025-03-18 08:52, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 14:23, torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
> wrote:
>> Thanks for reviewing the patch and comments!
>> Fixed issues you pointed out and attached v2 patch.
>
> This patch needs a rebase, because it's failing to compile currently.
> So I marked this as "Waiting on Author" in the commitfest app.
Thanks! I've attached an updated patch.
BTW based on your discussion, I thought this patch could not be merged
anytime soon. Does that align with your understanding?
- With bgworker-based AIO, this patch could mislead users into
underestimating the actual storage I/O load, which is undesirable.
- With io_uring-based AIO, this patch could provide meaningful values,
but it may take some time before io_uring sees widespread adoption.
--
Regards,
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
Seconded from NTT DATA GROUP CORPORATION to SRA OSS K.K.
