On 06/03/2026 16:12, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Firstly, I'm not sure what to do with ShmemRegisterHash() and the
> 'HASHCTL *infoP' argument to it. I feel it'd be nicer if the HASHCTL was
> just part of the ShmemHashDesc struct, but I'm not sure if that fits all
> the callers. I'll have to try that out I guess.
I took a stab at that, and it turned out to be straightforward. I'm not
sure why I hesitated on that earlier.
Here's a new version with that change, and a ton of little comment
cleanups and such.
- Heikki