Re: pgindent vs. pgperltidy command-line arguments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pgindent vs. pgperltidy command-line arguments
Date
Msg-id 7dc13980-318c-c52b-3657-099433e8b0f5@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgindent vs. pgperltidy command-line arguments  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 21.06.23 13:35, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> If not, part of my patch would still be useful.  Maybe I should commit 
>> my posted patch for PG16, to keep consistency with pgindent, and then 
>> your work would presumably be considered for PG17.
> 
> That sounds like a good plan.

done




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation
Next
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow pg_archivecleanup to remove backup history files