On 28.04.26 22:32, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Here's a full set of patches for back-patching purposes.
> protocol_openssl.c has a similar problem on older versions. I suppose this
> is the sort of thing I could back-patch all the way to v9.2. Does anyone
> feel strongly one way or the other about that?
Why should this be backpatched at all?