Re: Typecast bug? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Frank Joerdens
Subject Re: Typecast bug?
Date
Msg-id 7d10d2df0806260002w8707ea1rf8f62ca8126099a8@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Typecast bug?  (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>)
Responses Re: Typecast bug?  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 6/26/08, Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote:
> This seems like a bug to me, but it shows up as a performance problem.
> Since the column being queried is an integer, the second query (see below)
> can't possibly match, yet Postgres uses a typecast, forcing a full table
> scan for a value that can't possibly be in the table.

Which version are you using? 8.3 removes a lot of implicit casts (all?
not sure), so this may already be your fix.

Cheers,

Frank

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig James
Date:
Subject: Re: Typecast bug?
Next
From: "Guillaume Smet"
Date:
Subject: Re: Typecast bug?