Hi,
On 2019/02/06 19:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Given that a couple (?) of other patches depend on this, maybe it'd be a
>> good idea to proceed with this.
>
> If you are happy with the version attached, I am fine to commit it. I
> think that we have the right semantics and the right test coverage for
> this patch.
Yeah, I agree. Should also check with Alvaro maybe?
Thanks,
Amit