Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Farina
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION
Date
Msg-id 7b97c5a40912292156u13719546pbddd2f43557e3d71@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure.  If you think you can make it work using bytea, that seems
> clearly better than using an internal type, all things being equal.

I think both are perfectly viable and can be supported simultaneously,
actually...I simply like INTERNAL because the mechanism and passed
data structure for when you *do* want to write a C function is just
really crisp and simple, and is not going to be a source of overhead.

fdr


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION