Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Date
Msg-id 7b94f406-0cc0-20d6-f6e8-e677e6e8adb2@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/21/17 4:52 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> TL> The question to be asked is whether there is still anybody out there
> TL> using float timestamps.
>
> Gentoo's ebuild includes:
>
>    $(use_enable !pg_legacytimestamp integer-datetimes) \

FWIW, last time I looked it was also an option in FreeBSD's ports, 
though I think it's defaulted to int since forever ago (like, 7.4 era).
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster