Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
Date
Msg-id 7b5c224e-c9c0-fd93-2b51-b399de2d1d4b@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/25/22 13:52, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:36 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Create a CF entry for it, or enable CI on a github repo?
> I created a CF entry for it. Then I had to try to Google around to
> find the URL from the cfbot, because it's not even linked from
> commitfest.postgresql.org for some reason. #blamemagnus
>
> I don't think that the Windows CI is running the TAP tests for
> contrib. At least, I can't find any indication of it in the output. So
> it doesn't really help to assess how portable this test is, unless I'm
> missing something.
>
> I looked through the Linux output. It looks to me like that does run
> the TAP tests for contrib. Unfortunately, the output is not in order
> and is also not labelled, so it's hard to tell what output goes with
> what contrib module. I named my test 001_basic.pl, but there are 12 of
> those already. I see that 13 copies of 001_basic.pl seem to have
> passed CI on Linux, so I guess the test ran and passed there. It seems
> like it would be an awfully good idea to mention the subdirectory name
> before each dump of output.



Duplication of TAP test names has long been something that's annoyed me.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences