> On 19 Mar 2026, at 10:39, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
> I'm really late to the part, but I did not see it discussed elsewhere on
> a quick glance: Isn't pg_hosts.conf a really (too) generic name for this
> feature? I don't want to open a huge bikeshedding sub-thread, but was a
> more specific filename considered?
I don't recall any discussion on that, and I don't really see a problem off the
cuff. As it is a config file for defining hostnames and their config, in which
way do you feel its too generic and what would "claiming that name" for this
prevent (or how would it confuse)? Do you have any alternative suggestions?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
