> On Oct 28, 2025, at 04:29, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here is what I have staged for commit. I ended up simplifying the patch a
> bit. In particular, I thought better of the question mark business. It
> looks like we ordinarily just skip values that can't be found, and an empty
> search_path will appear as "" (two double-quotes), so you can still
> distinguish empty versus not-available.
+1, I like this idea.
V4 looks good to me.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
