Re: EOL for 7.4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: EOL for 7.4?
Date
Msg-id 79910d18d3a52af6b2dd503f7d31a960@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EOL for 7.4?  (Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de>)
Responses Re: EOL for 7.4?
Re: EOL for 7.4?
Re: EOL for 7.4?
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


>> needs significant preparation for them. Announcing an EOL early in time
>> would give them the required time before the version used disappears.
>
> So, should we announce it for June?

No, it should be longer. June is practically around the corner
as far as business planning is concerned. Make it a year. Since it's
mid November, why not just say 2011?

> And yes, i'm +1 for having a rule for EOL, like "5 versions are
> supported".

If we released on a consistent schedule, this *might* be possible.
But we don't, so we can't say something like this.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200911121815
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkr8lykACgkQvJuQZxSWSsi6xACdHU7xKgsfG+/zE2StXp97mdjC
XGoAn3LvIjzh1RKmD9K0Zyrg9W3LuHxt
=jCVo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: actualised funcs typmod patch
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: EOL for 7.4?