Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])
Date
Msg-id 7982.1375705113@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> writes:
> On Monday, August 05, 2013 11:57 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> My point here is just that we should keep the parameter values in plain
>> text files, 

> Here by text files, do you mean to say you are expecting
> file-per-guc-setting?

No, I don't think this argument really says much one way or the other
about one-file vs one-file-per-GUC.  I'm just lobbying against the
"put them in a catalog" idea.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Bottlenecks with large number of relation segment files
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Bottlenecks with large number of relation segment files