Re: Are we missing a dot in initdb's output? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Are we missing a dot in initdb's output?
Date
Msg-id 794730.1641408985@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Are we missing a dot in initdb's output?  ("Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
> initdb: warning: enabling "trust" authentication for local connections
> You can change this by editing pg_hba.conf or using the option -A, or
> --auth-local and --auth-host, the next time you run initdb.

> Shouldn't there be a "." after "authentication for local connections"?

Meh, I think this is mimicking our coding style for primary vs. detail
messages.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: PQcancel does not use tcp_user_timeout, connect_timeout and keepalive settings
Next
From: Dag Lem
Date:
Subject: Re: daitch_mokotoff module