Re: HELP: Urgent, Vacuum problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: HELP: Urgent, Vacuum problem
Date
Msg-id 791848D1-9703-4570-8B7D-9C75D1DCC826@khera.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HELP: Urgent, Vacuum problem  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Responses Re: HELP: Urgent, Vacuum problem  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Dec 5, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> I recently tossed 8.1 on my workstation which runs a little reporting
> application here.  I pointed the app from 7.4 to 8.1 and got a visit
> within about an hour from a user, asking if I'd done anything to my
> database.  Worrying that I'd made some mistake and he was getting an

I think you got lucky.  We had some issues with the transition from
7.4 to 8.0 due to more strictness of some queries, and some changes
in how strings were interpreted as numbers.  They were minor issues,
but you really need to regression test your app against new major
releases of Pg.


Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Brandon Aiken"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 contrib. "Full Disjunction"
Next
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.2 Now Available