newbie question: bytea v. large objects - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From David Saracini
Subject newbie question: bytea v. large objects
Date
Msg-id 791265.5432.qm@web82904.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-novice
Hello all,

I've been doing a little bit of reading on the difference between large objects and bytea.  Bytea feels a little bit
morelike what I'm use to with Oracle, MSSQL, etc.  However, I'm leaning towards using large objects, but one thing in
thedocumentation is bothering me: 

From documentation:

( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/lo-intro.html )

"PostgreSQL also supports a storage system called "TOAST" that automatically stores values larger than a single
databasepage into a secondary storage area per table. This makes the large object facility partially obsolete." 

I think it's the word "obsolete" that is bothering me :)

Does anyone know if I should consider large objects to be depreciated, and if there are plans for them to someday go
away?

Any other advice on the subject or links to reading I should do will be much appreciated.

Thanks,

David

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: "Just E. Mail"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.3.7 Clint to Server Connection Problem!
Next
From: Jasen Betts
Date:
Subject: Re: Time-based trigger/procedure