Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class
Date
Msg-id 790d3736-19e4-4e37-8c9b-52a0c09e5da5@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 17.12.25 08:07, Peter Smith wrote:
> 0. AFAIK, anything named with a "pg_" prefix generally means that the
> named thing is intended for PG internal use, right?

This might be a convention, but it's not enforced by the system, except 
for some object types like schemas and tablespaces.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert "Avoid requiring Spanish locale to test NLS infrastructur
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add regression test for aggregate NULL behavior