Re: pg_class.relistemp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_class.relistemp
Date
Msg-id 7903.1310671199@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_class.relistemp  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_class.relistemp
Re: pg_class.relistemp
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> BTW, if we're dumping relistemp, we're going to need to notify every
>> maker of a PostgreSQL admin interface before we release 9.1.

> Are they not testing our 9.1 betas?

There has never, ever, been a guarantee that the system catalogs don't
change across versions.  Anybody issuing such queries should expect to
have to retest them and possibly change them in each new major release.
I see nothing to sweat about here.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: per-column generic option
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache