Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material
Date
Msg-id 7894.985043317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Is it really necessary to maintain identical text in the test README
>> file and in the SGML docs?  I'm sorely tempted to remove the README
>> rather than double-editing yet again.

> It's referenced from the INSTALL file, because people presumably won't be
> able to read the HTML during installation.  Actually, the README was once
> generated from the HTML version.  It can be done again, but the exact
> process it kind of hazy.

If you've got any hints, I could really use a clue right about now ...
otherwise I'll have to do these LOCALE edits twice ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: elog with automatic file, line, and function